News

Apple co-founder wins against YouTube in Bitcoin scam lawsuit

Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak has won the latest round in a court battle against YouTube over the use of doctored videos featuring his likeness used in a Bitcoin scam in 2020. The latest appeals court verdict overruled a lower court judgment that absolved YouTube of any responsibility. 

Published

on

Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak has won the latest round in a court battle against YouTube over the use of doctored videos featuring his likeness used in a Bitcoin scam in 2020. The latest appeals court verdict overruled a lower court judgment that absolved YouTube of any responsibility. 

A San Jose appeals court ruled that YouTube cannot rely on a contentious communications statute to absolve it of liability for a fraud that exploited the Apple co-founder’s popularity using a doctored video to scam people.

The latest verdict allows Wozniak to continue the lawsuit against the video streaming platform and potentially paves the way for a change in the federal law protecting video streaming platforms such as YouTube from any liability that comes along with the videos posted on the platform.

The Apple co-founder and 17 others, including Bill Gates, Elon Musk and Michael Dell, filed a lawsuit against YouTube and its parent company, Google, in 2020 after doctored videos promoting a fake scam went viral on YouTube.

The latest appeals court verdict is seen as a significant win for Wozniak and others since a Santa Clara County Superior Court judge ruled in 2022 that the companies were protected from liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The appeal court judges observed that popular YouTube channels often get hacked to promote scams. Google and YouTube are responsible for “materially contributing” to the scam by “providing verification badges to hijacked YouTube channels.”

The platform also failed to remove these verification badges when the channels started posting scam videos, while one was awarded the verification badge during the scam process.

Thus, the appeal court observed that companies may not be protected by Section 230 immunity as it contributed to the scam by verifying.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Copyright © 2021 cryptonews.lk