FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is seeking to have up to 10 criminal charges against him dismissed in court, months ahead of his scheduled criminal trial in October.
In court documents filed in the Southern District Court in New York on May 8, SBF’s legal team pushed to dismiss everything apart from three counts of conspiracy to commit commodities fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Commenting on the move, crypto researcher Molly White suggested that “at least part of it seems to come down to the fact that additional charges were added after SBF’s extradition agreement was made.”
SBF was initially extradited to the U.S. from the Bahamas to face eight criminal charges of alleged fraud and money laundering; however, his legal team is arguing that the four of the five additional charges that were since been added from February “violates the Treaty’s rule of specialty provision.”
Under the “rule of specialty,” the requesting state (the U.S.) is generally bound to trial the extradited offender (SBF) only for the offense for which they were extradited.
During the extradition proceedings in The Bahamas, it was the understanding of all parties in court, coram judice¸ and the Court itself, that the specialty provisions applied notwithstanding the use of the simplified procedure. There was no waiver of the rule of specialty. To the contrary, there was an express acknowledgment that it applied, the lawyers argued.
These four charges include conspiracy to commit bank fraud and other individual wire fraud charges related to his alleged actions at FTX and Alameda. The most recent charge added, on March 28, concerns the alleged $40 million bribery of a Chinese government official.
Aside from this, SBF’s lawyers are also seeking to dismiss other charges relating to “conspiracy to defraud the United States” and charges relating to wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, arguing there has been a failure to state an adequate offense in these counts.
According to his legal team, the initial indictment sent via a Diplomatic Note fails to properly specify the violation relating to campaign financing laws, and it also doesn’t reference any U.S. bank accounts, including any bank accounts affiliated with FTX or Alameda relating to the wire fraud charges.
