Connect with us

News

Sam Bankman-Fried urges court to dismiss charges

FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is seeking to have up to 10 criminal charges against him dismissed in court, months ahead of his scheduled criminal trial in October.

Published

on

FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is seeking to have up to 10 criminal charges against him dismissed in court, months ahead of his scheduled criminal trial in October.

In court documents filed in the Southern District Court in New York on May 8, SBF’s legal team pushed to dismiss everything apart from three counts of conspiracy to commit commodities fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

Commenting on the move, crypto researcher Molly White suggested that “at least part of it seems to come down to the fact that additional charges were added after SBF’s extradition agreement was made.”

SBF was initially extradited to the U.S. from the Bahamas to face eight criminal charges of alleged fraud and money laundering; however, his legal team is arguing that the four of the five additional charges that were since been added from February “violates the Treaty’s rule of specialty provision.”

Under the “rule of specialty,” the requesting state (the U.S.) is generally bound to trial the extradited offender (SBF) only for the offense for which they were extradited.

During the extradition proceedings in The Bahamas, it was the understanding of all parties in court, coram judice¸ and the Court itself, that the specialty provisions applied notwithstanding the use of the simplified procedure. There was no waiver of the rule of specialty. To the contrary, there was an express acknowledgment that it applied, the lawyers argued.

These four charges include conspiracy to commit bank fraud and other individual wire fraud charges related to his alleged actions at FTX and Alameda. The most recent charge added, on March 28, concerns the alleged $40 million bribery of a Chinese government official.

Aside from this, SBF’s lawyers are also seeking to dismiss other charges relating to “conspiracy to defraud the United States” and charges relating to wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, arguing there has been a failure to state an adequate offense in these counts.

According to his legal team, the initial indictment sent via a Diplomatic Note fails to properly specify the violation relating to campaign financing laws, and it also doesn’t reference any U.S. bank accounts, including any bank accounts affiliated with FTX or Alameda relating to the wire fraud charges.

Business

OKX pleads guilty, pays $505M to settle DOJ charges

Published

on

OKX’s operating company, Aux Cayes FinTech Co. Ltd, has pleaded guilty to running an unlicensed money-transmitting business and agreed to a $505 million settlement with U.S. authorities. The settlement includes $84 million in penalties and the forfeiture of $421 million in transaction fees, mostly from institutional clients. The charges stem from legacy compliance gaps that allowed some U.S. customers to trade on the platform despite restrictions.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, OKX knowingly violated anti-money laundering laws, facilitating over $5 billion in suspicious transactions. Investigators also found that the exchange advised users on ways to bypass compliance checks, further aggravating the violations. However, no allegations of customer harm or charges against OKX employees were filed.

The breaches reportedly occurred between 2018 and early 2024, even though OKX had policies preventing U.S. customers from accessing its services since 2017. Acting U.S. Attorney Matthew Podolsky emphasized that financial institutions operating in the U.S. must comply with regulations and that the penalties serve as a warning to others. The FBI also condemned the company’s actions, stating that regulatory breaches would not be tolerated.

OKX has committed to strengthening its compliance framework and hiring a consultant to address past shortcomings. CEO Star Xu stated that the company aims to become a leader in regulatory compliance across global markets. Despite the hefty settlement, OKX maintains that its U.S. customer base was minimal and has since been removed from the platform.

Continue Reading

Business

South Dakota lawmakers effectively kill proposed Bitcoin bill

Published

on

South Dakota lawmakers have effectively blocked a bill that would have permitted the state to invest in Bitcoin. During a House Commerce and Energy Committee meeting, legislators voted to defer House Bill 1202 to the 41st day of the session, a procedural move that ensures its failure since the legislative session only lasts 40 days. The bill, introduced by Representative Logan Manhart, sought to amend the state’s public funds classification to allow up to 10% investment in Bitcoin.

Despite the setback, Manhart has stated that he plans to reintroduce the bill in 2026. South Dakota’s attempt follows similar initiatives in other states, including North Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming, which also failed to pass Bitcoin reserve bills. However, states like Florida, Arizona, and Kentucky are still considering legislation related to Bitcoin investments. These efforts reflect a broader trend among U.S. states exploring digital assets as part of their financial strategies.

The push for state-level Bitcoin reserves gained momentum following U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to establish a national Bitcoin stockpile. In a recent executive order, Trump suggested forming a working group to study the feasibility of such a reserve. However, legal challenges have emerged regarding the constitutionality of many of his executive actions, casting uncertainty over their implementation.

With the SEC recently closing investigations into some crypto firms, regulatory sentiment in the U.S. appears to be shifting. While South Dakota’s bill failed, the broader discussion on Bitcoin as a state-held asset continues across the country. The increasing interest from lawmakers indicates that digital assets could still play a role in state-level financial strategies in the coming years.

Continue Reading

Business

Ethereum’s favorable risk-return ratio has traders ‘insanely bullish’ on ETH price

Published

on

A crypto analyst has expressed strong bullish sentiment on Ethereum (ETH), citing a highly favorable risk-reward ratio. The analysis highlights that ETH is only 18% above its 200-week exponential moving average (EMA), a level historically associated with price rebounds. The potential upside for ETH is estimated at 200%, with a worst-case drawdown of just 20%. Additionally, technical indicators, including an ascending channel and a liquidity cluster above $4,000, suggest that the price could be gearing up for a significant breakout.

Further on-chain data from Glassnode supports this outlook, revealing strong accumulation at key price levels. Investors have been purchasing ETH heavily around $2,632, with a larger cluster at $3,150, indicating confidence in further price appreciation. This trend suggests that rather than exiting positions, market participants are averaging down, reinforcing the bullish narrative.

Meanwhile, analysts point to Ethereum’s increasing buy pressure compared to Bitcoin. On-chain data from CryptoQuant shows ETH’s taker buy-sell ratio rising while BTC’s declines, signaling stronger buying momentum for ETH. Historically, such trends have allowed ETH to outperform Bitcoin in the short term. However, technical risks remain, with a need to maintain support above $2,600 to avoid a shift in market sentiment.

Despite short-term volatility, ETH’s overall market structure appears robust, with analysts predicting new highs in the coming months. The current accumulation phase and liquidity positioning indicate that Ethereum may see a significant upward move if key resistance levels are broken. However, investors remain cautious, monitoring broader market conditions and potential bearish signals.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 cryptonews.lk